In the previous article, we saw peremptory evidence that the Torah that exists today is not that which was revealed to Moses, and certainly not the word of God, this matter is sufficient to prove that the Bible is not the word of God either, given that the Bible contains the Torah that exists today, which we have previously proven is not the word God, and therefore the whole book lost its credibility.
We don't limite ourselves with only the above, even if it is logically sufficient, but we also add to it some errors related to the tree of the lineage of Christ himself, by comparing the lineage tree of Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew in the first chapter, and with the lineage tree of Jesus in the Gospel of Luke in the third chapter, this comparison showed several differences, of them we mention:
The first difference: the difference in Joseph's father, in the Gospel of Matthew is Jacob, and in the Gospel of Luke is Heli:
And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
Matthew 1:16.
And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli
Luke 3:23
The second difference: According to the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus is one of the descendants of Solomon son of David, peace be upon them, and according to the Gospel of Luke, Jesus is one from the descendants of Nathan son of David.
And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias
Matthew 1:6
Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David
Luke 3:31
The third difference: Salathiel, who is the grandfather of Jesus according to the two trees, they different in his father, according to Matthew his father is Jechonias, and according to Luke his father is Neri.
And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel
Matthew 1:12
Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri
Luke 3:27
The fourth difference: It is the difference in Zerubabel's sons, who is one of the ancestors of Jesus according to the two trees, so his son according to Matthew he is called Abiud, as we will see, while he is called Rhesa according to the previous verse of Luke, which is strange in this difference is that by referring to the first book of the Chronicles of the third chapter, we find all The sons of Zerubbabel, and we find neither Risa nor Abiud in them, as we see below:
And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor
Matthew 1:13.
And the sons of Pedaiah were, Zerubbabel, and Shimei: and the sons of Zerubbabel; Meshullam, and Hananiah, and Shelomith their sister
1 Chronicles 3:19
And Hashubah, and Ohel, and Berechiah, and Hasadiah, Jushab–hesed, five.
1 Chronicles 3:20
These differences leave no room for doubt, that the Bible are not from God, because He is glorified and exalted that never contradicts himself.
Comments
Post a Comment